St. Louis City · November 3, 2026
Election Day is Tuesday, November 3. This guide shows what’s on the City of St. Louis ballot, how to vote, and how to join our forum on October 29.
We made this guide for Futuremakers members. We want more people taking part in civic life, and voting is a big part of that. Futuremakers doesn’t support or oppose any candidate or ballot measure. We value every viewpoint and hope everyone votes.
Tap any item to open it. Ballot measures show a plain-language summary and the exact ballot language.
Ballot guideGeneral Election · City of St. Louis · November 3, 2026 · All Precincts
State Rep. District 76 (Vote for one)
State Rep. District 77 (Vote for one)
State Rep. District 78 (Vote for one)
State Rep. District 79 (Vote for one)
State Rep. District 80 (Vote for one)
State Rep. District 81 (Vote for one)
State Rep. District 82 (Vote for one)
State Rep. District 84 (Vote for one)
Shall Judge PAUL C. WILSON of the Missouri Supreme Court be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge VIRGINIA W. LAY of the Eastern District Court of Appeals be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge REBECA NAVARRO-MCKELVEY of the Eastern District Court of Appeals be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge ANGELA TURNER QUIGLESS of the Eastern District Court of Appeals be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge CLINTON ROBERT WRIGHT, Circuit Judge of Judicial Circuit No. 22 (Division No. 2), be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge ELIZABETH BYRNE HOGAN, Circuit Judge of Judicial Circuit No. 22 (Division No. 3), be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge KATHERINE M. FOWLER, Circuit Judge of Judicial Circuit No. 22 (Division No. 4), be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge ANNETTE LLEWELLYN, Circuit Judge of Judicial Circuit No. 22 (Division No. 5), be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge JOSEPH P. WHYTE, Circuit Judge of Judicial Circuit No. 22 (Division No. 7), be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge TIMOTHY J. BOYER, Circuit Judge of Judicial Circuit No. 22 (Division No. 8), be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge SCOTT A. MILLIKAN, Circuit Judge of Judicial Circuit No. 22 (Division No. 9), be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge CALEA STOVALL-REID, Circuit Judge of Judicial Circuit No. 22 (Division No. 10), be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge MADELINE ORLING CONNOLLY, Circuit Judge of Judicial Circuit No. 22 (Division No. 12), be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge HEATHER J. HAYS, Circuit Judge of Judicial Circuit No. 22 (Division No. 14), be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge DAVID A. ROITHER, Circuit Judge of Judicial Circuit No. 22 (Division No. 15), be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge MICHAEL F. STELZER, Circuit Judge of Judicial Circuit No. 22 (Division No. 30), be retained in office?
Yes · NoShall Judge MICHAEL R. DAUPHIN, Associate Circuit Judge of Judicial Circuit No. 22 (Division No. 28), be retained in office?
Yes · NoIn plain language
Would repeal the reproductive health care amendment voters approved in 2024. It would allow abortion in cases of rape or incest before 12 weeks of pregnancy, in emergencies and for fetal anomalies; allow laws regulating abortion; require parental consent for minors’ abortions; and prohibit gender transition procedures for minors.
Exact ballot language
Proposed by the 103rd General Assembly (First Regular Session) HCS HJR 73
Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to:
State governmental entities estimate no costs or savings. Greene County estimates it may experience an unknown increase in tax revenue. Other local governmental entities estimate no costs or savings.
YES - FOR THE AMENDMENT · NO - AGAINST THE AMENDMENT
In plain language
Would make the initiative and referendum petition process a fundamental right, let courts revise ballot summaries through lawsuits, and bar the legislature from weakening those powers. Changing or repealing laws passed by initiative, or passing laws like ones voters rejected by referendum, would take at least 80% of both chambers of the legislature. Current majority-vote and signature requirements would stay the same.
Exact ballot language
Proposed by Initiative Petition
Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to:
State and local governmental entities estimate no costs or savings.
YES - FOR THE AMENDMENT · NO - AGAINST THE AMENDMENT
In plain language
Would create a permanent public endowment fund to support state government. The legislature could not spend or divert the fund, and state-imposed taxes would end once the fund earns enough to replace them.
Exact ballot language
Proposed by 103rd General Assembly (Second Regular Session) SS SCS SJR 95
Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to establish a permanent public endowment fund to support state government instead of taxing Missouri residents, prohibit the General Assembly from appropriating or diverting the fund, and eliminate state-imposed taxes once the fund generates sufficient revenue to replace them?
State and local governmental entities estimate no costs or savings.
YES - FOR THE AMENDMENT · NO - AGAINST THE AMENDMENT
In plain language
Would put the right to elect a county sheriff in the state constitution, allow a sheriff to be removed only through a writ of quo warranto (a court action challenging someone’s right to hold office), and recognize the sheriff’s office as part of the administration of justice.
Exact ballot language
Proposed by the 103rd General Assembly (Second Regular Session) CCS HCS SS SJR 87
Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to support law enforcement by preserving the right of citizens to elect a county sheriff, prohibiting the removal of a county sheriff except by a writ of quo warranto, and recognizing the office of sheriff as part of the administration of justice?
State and local governmental entities estimate no costs or savings.
YES - FOR THE AMENDMENT · NO - AGAINST THE AMENDMENT
In plain language
Asks whether to approve the congressional district map the legislature passed in 2025 (House Bill No. 1). A yes vote approves the new map. A no vote rejects it, keeping the current map.
Exact ballot language
Proposed by Referendum Petition
Do the people of the state of Missouri approve the act of the General Assembly entitled "House Bill No. 1 (2025 Second Extraordinary Session)," which repeals Missouri's existing congressional plan, and replaces it with new congressional boundaries that keep more counties intact?
State and local governmental entities estimate no costs or savings.
YES - FOR THE PROPOSITION · NO - AGAINST THE PROPOSITION
In plain language
Special city elections would use the same non-partisan, top-two runoff system used in regular city elections. It does this by repealing Section 5 of Article IV of the City Charter.
Exact ballot language
(CHARTER AMENDMENT)
Shall the City of St. Louis use the same non-partisan, top-two runoff system in special elections that is used in regular city elections by repealing Section 5 of Article IV of the Charter?
YES - FOR THE PROPOSITION · NO - AGAINST THE PROPOSITION
In plain language
Would amend the City Charter to add a citywide sales tax of one-half of one percent (50 cents on a $100 purchase) for a new Early Childhood Education Fund serving children 5 and younger. A new St. Louis Early Childhood Education Board of Trustees would administer the money under a contract with the city.
Exact ballot language
Proposed by Initiative Petition
Shall the City of St. Louis, by Charter amendment, impose a citywide sales tax of one-half of one percent on all retail sales in the City of St. Louis for the purpose of establishing an Early Childhood Education Fund to support programs and services relating to the quality, affordability, and access to early childhood education for children aged 5 (five) years and younger, with revenues administered by a newly-established St. Louis Early Childhood Education Board of Trustees pursuant to a contract with the City of St. Louis?
YES - FOR THE PROPOSITION · NO - AGAINST THE PROPOSITION
Follows the City of St. Louis All Precincts sample ballot from the Board of Election Commissioners, in ballot order. Contest titles, names, parties and ballot language are copied exactly. Plain-language summaries are written by Futuremakers to be neutral and are not part of the ballot. Your own ballot shows only the contests for your address. For background on judges, see Your Missouri Judges.
A nonpartisan forum on St. Louis City ballot propositions and the St. Louis Public Schools Board of Education election. Hear directly from candidates and campaigns, ask questions and talk with other St. Louisans.
Futuremakers Club is hosting a nonpartisan forum focused on St. Louis City ballot propositions and the St. Louis Public Schools Board of Education election. Voters are invited to hear directly from candidates and campaigns, ask questions, review their ballots and talk with other St. Louisans about the issues affecting our city.
The forum is designed for voters who want to learn more before making their decisions, particularly those who are undecided or interested in hearing different perspectives. This is an opportunity for dialogue and civic education, not a political rally.
Futuremakers is a judgment-free space. Whether you’ve followed every ballot issue or are just beginning to learn about the election, you’re welcome here.
The final run of show will be confirmed before the event. St. Louis City propositions and the Board of Education will be prioritized, as well as any districts covering downtown that have multiple candidates. Unopposed candidates are invited to speak if their district covers downtown.
For ballot propositions, representatives from both sides will be invited to share their positions and answer moderated and audience questions. Board of Education candidates will each have three minutes to introduce themselves.
If only one side of an issue participates, a Futuremakers board member will provide a neutral summary of the opposing position before opening the discussion to audience questions.
Candidates and campaigns associated with the issues on the agenda are invited to participate in the moderated discussions. Each campaign may designate one speaker or send a representative on its behalf.
All other candidates and campaigns appearing on the November 3 ballot are welcome to attend, bring materials and speak with guests before and after the forum.
To request a speaking opportunity, use the campaign sign-up form by the end of the day on Tuesday, October 27.
Futuremakers encourages diplomacy, decorum and thoughtful civic participation. St. Louisans often share similar hopes for their city while holding different opinions about how to achieve them. Respectful disagreement is a valuable part of civic life, and everyone should have the opportunity to express their views, ask questions and listen without interruption.
Futuremakers Club will not endorse candidates or take positions on ballot measures. Our role is to convene and provide opportunities for unbiased civic education and meaningful conversation.
Tuesday, November 3. Play Bingo all day, then follow the results with us that night.
Spot it, snap it and you could win.
Play along on November 3. Snap a photo for each square you spot. Get five in a row, then DM your photos to Futuremakers.
Tap a square to mark it.
Join us in person downtown.
Tuesday, November 3 · 6–9 p.m.
Park Pacific, 22nd floor
Crunch numbers live in the conference room, or hang out and wait for results to come in.
Can’t make it to Park Pacific? Follow along with us from anywhere.
Forum: Thursday, October 29 | 5:30–7:30 p.m. | Trust, 401 Pine St. Free and open to the public.
Election Night Watch Party: Tuesday, November 3 | 6–9 p.m. | Park Pacific, 22nd floor. RSVP required for security reasons.
Coming to the forum with a question or a topic you’d like covered? Submit it with your RSVP. Moderators review every submission.
For candidates and campaigns on the November 3 ballot. Sign up by the end of the day on Tuesday, October 27, using the form below, including to request a speaking opportunity. Questions? Email team@FuturemakersClub.org.